The article argues that the vision of education prioritizing tech skills is flawed and alienates people who cannot afford expensive EdTech memberships or fit into the 'one-size-fits-all' pipeline. Those who cannot keep up with the relentless march of innovation are left behind, and society prioritizes productivity over humanity. The article suggests that skills such as problem-solving, innovation, and tech fluency are more like slippery buzzwords, while storytelling, caretaking, and emotional labor have been sidelined. The future of education should not only be about skills but should seek a diverse range of perspectives and skills to build a society that works for humans.
The article criticizes the consensus around the future of education, arguing that it is optimized for productivity rather than humanity. Society's obsession with progress often comes with a price tag that not everyone can afford.
The article asserts that the current blueprint for education lacks diversity, only catering to students who fit the narrow mold of tech-savvy whizzes who can code effortlessly and manage digital classrooms with ease.
The article argues that the tech-driven future of education risks building a marathon where only a few have running shoes while the rest are left on the sidelines, unable to catch up. The global consensus around the future of education runs the risk of exclusionary rather than aspirational.
The article argues that care taking, emotional labor, and storytelling have been sidelined, and society is losing out on the soul of society, building a future where people are valued based on how well they fit into the machine rather than their humanity.
The article argues that the assumption that the only skills that matter are those tied to technology and productivity is flawed. The focus should not be on 'future-proofing' skills but on designing a future that caters to humans' diverse needs, cultures, and traditions.
The article concludes that the future of education is about making sure everyone is onboard, and it should not be a relentless race with no finish line in sight. The question should not be about how to prepare workers for the future, but how to design a future that works for humans.