The history of technology showcases instances where superior solutions failed to gain traction while inferior alternatives succeeded due to effective marketing and adoption strategies.
Breakthrough technologies face challenges between innovation and adoption, referred to as the 'valley of death,' where excellent solutions can disappear.
Institutional resistance can hinder the adoption of new frameworks due to established players and professionals having vested interests in existing complex systems.
The expectation for extensive documentation and complexity in developer tools can work against simpler solutions that may actually be more effective.
Large organizations favor established solutions due to risk aversion, leading to a circular dependency where widespread adoption is necessary for enterprise uptake.
Successful framework adoption requires coordinated marketing efforts, which garage innovators often lack compared to frameworks backed by large companies.
Simplicity in a technically superior framework can hinder adoption as developers may struggle to see its value compared to more complex solutions.
Network effects play a significant role in adoption, with established frameworks benefiting from well-developed ecosystems that new frameworks lack.
Successful new frameworks find a niche, build a passionate community, and offer bridge strategies for gradual adoption to overcome barriers.
System thinking is crucial for successful framework adoption, understanding technology adoption as a social process beyond just technical excellence.