<ul data-eligibleForWebStory="true"><li>Code reviews are essential for improving code quality but can sometimes hinder progress by going too far.</li><li>Issues like perfectionism, scope creep, analysis paralysis, exhaustive reviews, and rigid standards can lead to delays and frustration.</li><li>To address these problems, focus on risk-based review intensity, time-boxing, clear guidelines, fostering the right culture, and utilizing tools such as automation and AI reviewers.</li><li>Balancing code reviews involves calibrating intensity based on risk, time-boxing reviews, setting clear guidelines, fostering the right culture, and using automation tools.</li><li>Ultimately, the goal of code reviews is to deliver value to users while maintaining a sustainable codebase, not striving for perfection.</li></ul>

When Code Reviews Go Too Far: Finding the Balance Between Quality and Velocity

Discover more