A zero-carbon UK steel plant is being considered by British ministers, mirroring a plant that was moved to Saudi Arabia from the UK in 2006.
The UK government's plan for a Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) plant is met with controversy within the British steel sector, with concerns raised about the use of taxpayer money.
Recent emergency legislation gave the government control over British Steel's blast furnaces in Scunthorpe, aiming to preserve the UK's ability to produce primary steel.
The shift towards DRI technology could potentially reduce emissions in steel production through the use of green hydrogen instead of methane.
Despite government support for DRI, the industry considers other priorities like energy cost reductions and preventing metal imports diverted to avoid tariffs.
UK Steel emphasizes the need to address urgent issues like high electricity prices and trade defense to sustain the steel industry.
The UK's industrial energy prices are among the highest globally, making the viability of a DRI plant questionable in terms of value for money.
Concerns are raised about the capability of UK steelworks to justify significant DRI supplies that would support a new plant, as larger producers may not be interested.
Union leaders and MPs argue that investing in DRI for maintaining primary steelmaking capability is crucial for economic resilience and national security.
The UK government awaits a report on DRI's importance from the Materials Processing Institute, which will influence future decisions on subsidizing a new plant.