A naukri.com initiative
Leadgrowdevelop
1M
138
Image Credit: Leadgrowdevelop
Why Hiring for Potential Beats Experience (Almost) Every Time
- HR and hiring managers often differ on whether to hire for potential or experience, with HR favoring potential due to strategic goals while hiring managers prioritize immediate productivity.
- Experience alone does not guarantee improvement or excellence, whereas high potential employees have the capability to excel over time, despite needing ramp time initially.
- Cognitive ability is a stronger performance indicator than experience, particularly in cognitively complex roles where smarter employees outperform experienced ones.
- Personality traits strongly predict retention and engagement, with a mismatch between role requirements and individual disposition leading to attrition risk.
- While potential generally outweighs experience, hiring for experience may be more suitable in roles without training, where immediate productivity is crucial.
- Experience may be prioritized over potential in situations where assessments are not feasible or in temporary roles with minimal onboarding expectations.
- Organizations tend to overvalue experience in hiring decisions, despite potential offering greater long-term performance benefits.
- Balancing experience and potential can optimize hiring decisions, especially for junior staff where initial experience plays a pivotal role.
- Insecurities among hiring managers about hiring high-potential candidates can lead to resistance, but organizations should focus on optimizing selection processes for long-term success.
Read Full Article
8 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app