Design Thinking, despite its emphasis on empathy, iteration, and collaboration, is critiqued for oversimplifying design into a process that overlooks the challenging aspects of design work.
Professional designers often view Design Thinking as a diluted version of their field that marginalizes their skills and expertise.
While Design Thinking can facilitate stakeholder engagement and idea generation, it falls short in delivering tangible solutions, focusing more on mindset shifts than concrete results.
The approach is criticized for neglecting critical components of design such as research, technical feasibility, and implementation, thereby leading to lower-quality outcomes.
Design Thinking is highlighted for its heavy emphasis on ideation at the expense of execution, leaving the actual implementation to others or disregarding it entirely.
Experienced designers stress that design is not merely about generating ideas but about crafting real solutions through problem framing, responsibility, solution shaping, and actualization.
Design Thinking workshops often create a sense of momentum and enthusiasm but may result in shallow solutions that lack the depth required for successful implementation.
The disconnect between design thinking workshops and actual design practice can lead to watered-down solutions that fail to address technical feasibility, policy constraints, and operational realities.
Design Thinking's simplistic portrayal as a quick fix to complex problems in enterprise settings can hinder the development of true design capability and maturity within organizations.
The critique underscores the need for a shift from Design Thinking to 'design doing,' emphasizing the importance of genuine design practice over superficial methodologies for innovation.
The author calls for a focus on the hard work of research, design, and delivery rather than relying solely on frameworks like Design Thinking for achieving real outcomes in design.