A startup called RisingWave decided to replace 276,406 lines of C++ code with Rust for their database project, facing challenges like unreadable coding style and memory leaks in C++.
Despite experienced C++ engineers in the team, they found C++ shortcomings to be overwhelming and made the difficult decision to move to Rust for their database system.
The transition from C++ to Rust required rewriting the entire system from scratch, but ultimately proved beneficial as RisingWave gained popularity with over 7,600 stars on GitHub.
C++ offers high performance and control over memory and computation but comes with challenges like debugging difficulties and dependency management issues.
Rust was chosen over C++ for RisingWave as it guarantees memory safety, thread safety, zero-cost abstractions, and efficient collaboration, making it a better choice for the project.
Rust's safety features, ease of use, manageability of unsafe code, and learning curve were significant factors in favor of choosing Rust over C++ for RisingWave's database project.
Despite some challenges with Rust, such as fragmented async ecosystem and cumbersome error handling, the overall productivity and code quality improvements were substantial.
The decision to switch to Rust was influenced by factors like codebase refactoring, advocacy from Rust enthusiasts in the team, and rapid expansion of the engineering team.
The article highlights the importance of carefully evaluating factors like low-level programming needs, availability of expertise, time requirements, and potential impact on deadlines before deciding to switch programming languages.
While Rust may offer benefits, it's essential not to rewrite a project solely based on trendiness, but rather on practical considerations and project-specific needs.
Making a wise choice in selecting a programming language can significantly impact the success and efficiency of a project, potentially saving substantial time and resources in the long run.