The Paris Judicial Court had previously ordered Google, Cloudflare, and Cisco to block access to pirate websites by poisoning their DNS.
Additional rightsholders like DAZN and beIN submitted similar requests targeting public DNS resolvers such as Cloudflare, Google, and Quad9.
A new court order requested by beIN's French sister company targeted public DNS resolvers for allegedly resolving domain names linked to sports piracy.
Domains like sporttvls.com and lshunter.net were alleged to broadcast unauthorized content, but insufficient proof led to denial of blocking requests.
The court ruled that beIN failed to provide substantial evidence of 'grave and repeated' infringements to warrant blocking measures.
Proof of infringing streams, such as displaying the beIN logo, was lacking for some domains like streamendous.online and techydeals.online.
Google and Cloudflare disputed beIN's exclusive broadcast rights and challenged the evidence provided for blocking requests.
Quad9, a DNS provider, did not participate in the legal battle due to resource constraints but stands against blocking actions.
Despite recent opposition, rightsholders are extending DNS blocking requests across Europe and the United States.
Google and Cloudflare are expected to vigorously oppose these efforts until all options are exhausted.