A comparative evaluation of surrogate modeling approaches for predicting drag on a real-world car aerodynamics dataset was conducted.
The evaluation compared a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model using a signed distance field as input and a commercial tool based on Graph Neural Networks (GNN) processing a surface mesh.
The CNN-based method achieved a mean absolute error of 2.3 drag counts, while the GNN-based method achieved 3.8.
Both methods achieved approximately 77% accuracy in predicting the direction of drag change relative to the baseline geometry.