Technical debt in software development can arise from code, testing, architecture, tooling, inefficient processes, knowledge gaps, and more.
Misunderstandings around Scrum and Lean methodologies can lead to technical debt accumulation, hampering project success.
Issues such as short-term thinking, overemphasis on features, lack of testing and refactoring, absence of standards, and poor documentation contribute to technical debt.
Separation between business and development, lack of trust, and reactive mindset also impact technical debt management negatively.
Ignoring technical debt can result in project slowdown, loss of reputation, customer dissatisfaction, and potential business failure.
Approaches to addressing technical debt include cleanup sprints, sunsetting projects, and incremental refactoring, with the latter being the most effective.
Continuous Debment (CD2) integrates debt management into daily tech processes by emphasizing proactive debt reviews, incremental refactoring, and team ownership.
Measuring the effects of technical debt through metrics like time to deliver features, system performance, employee turnover, and customer satisfaction can help in understanding its impact.
Managing technical debt involves trusting the team, integrating debt management into daily development, enforcing coding standards, and continuously evaluating and addressing debt.
CI/CD2 is highlighted as a mindset rather than a tool, emphasizing the importance of incorporating technical debt management into everyday development practices for project sustainability.