President Trump's administration plans to significantly reduce funding for key US research centers, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (Noaa) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa), impacting climate science programs.
The proposed cuts, which are described as draconian, could compromise safety, economic competitiveness, and national security, with Noaa's funding potentially being slashed from $485m to $171m.
The plan includes eliminating crucial climate, weather, and ocean research capabilities, affecting the ability to protect citizens and lead globally in environmental research.
Additionally, the National Marine Fisheries Service faces a proposed $324m cut, emphasizing alignment with energy priorities over species recovery, habitat conservation, and fisheries research.
The administration also intends to reduce funding for Nasa, particularly in planetary science, earth science, and astrophysics research, potentially jeopardizing critical space missions.
Budget documents indicate a 20% overall budget loss for Nasa, leading to the cancellation of missions and closure of facilities, sparking concerns about the impact on scientific progress and wastage of taxpayer dollars.
While these plans are not final and subject to congressional approval, experts and officials express alarm over the potential setback to scientific advancements and global leadership in climate science.
Critics warn that the proposed cuts could have far-reaching consequences, affecting various sectors and signaling a disregard for improving quality of life, economy, and public safety through research and innovation.
The cuts are viewed as a blow to Nasa's scientific endeavors and a hindrance to climate science, with concerns raised about the impact on communities, industries, and the overall stance on environmental research.
The administration's approach to scaling back funding for science-based agencies like Noaa and Nasa highlights a stark departure from previous priorities and raises questions about the future of climate science in the US.
As lawmakers and stakeholders assess the implications of these proposed cuts, the pushback underscores the importance of supporting scientific research and its vital role in addressing pressing challenges like climate change.