The EU's Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies aimed to revolutionize agricultural and food systems, aligning with climate, biodiversity, and health goals of the Green Deal.
However, political realities suggest the EU's agenda may not signify a significant shift in agri-food governance.
Scholarship by Candel and Daugbjerg questions whether the EU's sustainability agenda truly breaks from traditional exceptionalism.
The strategies sought to enhance sustainability, animal welfare, food safety, and biodiversity, signaling a move towards holistic food system transformation.
While there was discourse broadening, institutional and interest-based obstacles hindered substantial policy reform.
Existing power structures, including agricultural lobbies, limit institutional transformation despite nominal stakeholder inclusivity.
Agricultural interests and member states with farming sectors often oppose Green Deal objectives, impeding policy implementation.
Reforms like pesticide reduction and land-use regulations face resistance, leading to modest policy outcomes compared to initial ambitions.
EU's agri-food governance challenges exemplify the struggle between sustainability and entrenched economic paradigms.
The EU's journey towards post-exceptionalism highlights the need for substantial reforms and inclusive dialogue for genuine transformation.