A naukri.com initiative
Guardian
1M
323
Image Credit: Guardian
Even rightwingers are mocking the ‘Epstein files’ as a lot of redacted nothing
- The Trump administration promised to declassify shocking information about Jeffrey Epstein and his associates but ended up releasing heavily redacted information that was already in the public domain.
- Influencers were given binders labeled 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1', which contained mostly old and leaked documents.
- Critics, including a Palm Beach lawyer, Spencer Kuvin, viewed the release as a publicity stunt and accused the administration of using Epstein's victims for political gain.
- The release, mocked even by right-wingers like Laura Loomer, was criticized for being unprofessional and lacking substance.
- The White House's choice of influencers to preview the information, including controversial figures like Mike Cernovich, raised eyebrows.
- The fallout from the Epstein files fiasco highlighted how the administration shifted blame to entities like the FBI and the southern district of New York, rather than taking responsibility.
- The incident also underscored the lack of accountability for Epstein's enablers and associates, with only Ghislaine Maxwell facing consequences.
- The article also mentions the Tate brothers, charged with human trafficking, landing in the US after Romania lifted travel restrictions following a request from the Trump administration.
- It discusses how some 'abortion abolitionists' are advocating for women who have abortions to face the death penalty, a stance slowly gaining mainstream attention in the US.
- Additionally, the article touches on children dying of hypothermia in Gaza, Katy Perry's upcoming space trip with Jeff Bezos, and challenges with contraceptive methods not evolving over time.
Read Full Article
19 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app