Fairness in federated learning is a rapidly growing research area focusing on formal definitions and algorithmic interventions but often overlooks sociotechnical contexts.
Existing approaches in fairness for federated learning optimize system level metrics and ignore harms throughout the FL lifecycle and their impact on diverse stakeholders.
Critical analysis of the literature exposes recurring issues like framing fairness only through server-client architecture, simulation-context mismatches, and lack of multi-stakeholder alignment.
A harm-centered framework is proposed to connect fairness definitions to risks and stakeholder vulnerabilities, advocating for more thorough and accountable fairness research in federated learning.