Analyzing backlog volatility and coherence is crucial for informed decision-making and effective communication with stakeholders.Backlog size can mask volatility, affecting correlation scores interpretation. Analyzing subsets is recommended.High Spearman’s ρ or Kendall’s τ scores indicate stable priorities, while low scores signify drastic shifts.Stakeholders' changing demands play a significant role in prioritizing backlog items and influencing predictability.Transparency about backlog volatility is essential for managing expectations and communicating effectively.Forecasting delivery timelines requires considering both past performance and current backlog volatility.Prioritizing honesty and transparency when priorities shift drastically is key to maintaining stakeholder trust.Data-driven insights enable more confident conversations with stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of context.Using data without understanding the context can be misleading and unprofessional, emphasizing the need for ethical data usage.Pairing data with contextual understanding and effective communication is essential for leveraging its power in decision-making.