The study categorized cannabis users between those who utilize it for medical purposes only, combine medical and nonmedical use and those who indulge for nonmedical use only.
Individuals in medical-only and combined use categories reported significantly higher instances of cannabis use disorder across all severity levels as compared to nonmedical-only users, raising questions about the perceived safety of medical cannabis use as compared to recreational use.
Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of educating both healthcare professionals and patients about the potential addiction risks associated with medical cannabis use.
The study results suggest that medical cannabis use does not inherently reduce the risk of developing a dependence or addiction-related issues, signifying the need for more nuanced understanding of cannabis use dynamics.
This study forms a pivotal contribution to the discourse surrounding the substantial knowledge gap in understanding the risks attached to medical cannabis use.
Public health campaigns must be developed emphasizing moderation and awareness to mitigate the risks of escalated consumption and addiction.
The analysis of demographic factors reveals that age, gender, and socio-economic status can significantly influence cannabis usage patterns.
Policymakers and researchers must strive to paint a clearer picture of the consequences of cannabis use, particularly in a rapidly changing landscape where its medical and recreational status is being continuously redefined.
Acknowledging the paradox of medical cannabis while addressing its potential for addiction will be fundamental in shaping future research and policy decisions.
Only through a comprehensive understanding of the intricate interplay between cannabis user categories can we hope to devise efficient strategies for prevention and treatment of cannabis use disorder.