Robert P. Crease, a researcher at Stony Brook University, received a termination notice for his National Science Foundation (NSF) award, along with 400 other researchers, due to the Trump administration's decision to reclaim $233 million in grants.
Crease questioned the validity of his termination, as his project aimed to enhance national scientific facilities and was well within the NSF's mission.
He speculated if certain words in his proposal led to the termination, but later discovered that the NSF database had erroneous information about his grant, leading to a mistaken termination.
After contacting the NSF and Stony Brook's grants-management office, it was revealed that his termination was an error, and the NSF retracted the notice.
Crease reflected on the incompetence of various US agencies and felt guilty for being upset about the termination of his award, which was nearly completed.
The retraction of his termination highlighted the flaws within the Trump administration's handling of research grants and administrative decisions.
Crease expressed his intentions to continue studying the government's approach to science and its citizens, using his experience as a victim of administrative incompetence.
Despite the challenges faced, Crease acknowledged his badge of honor, not for threatening the administration but for being subjected to its inefficiency.
In conclusion, Crease's recount serves as a testament to the repercussions of administrative errors and the impact on academic research and its stakeholders.