A study focusing on Rotterdam's housing policies reveals how well-intentioned policies may unintentionally erode social resilience.
Rotterdam aims for 'balanced neighborhoods' by integrating varying income groups, but this approach faces challenges.
The study examines the clash between social resilience goals and market-driven mechanisms in Rotterdam's policies.
Research shows that Rotterdam's housing policies may perpetuate inequality despite striving for surface-level diversification.
The study emphasizes the importance of non-quantifiable aspects like trust in fostering social cohesion within neighborhoods.
Gentrification risks posed by housing market pressures challenge the concepts of social integration and stability in Rotterdam.
Implementing 'balanced neighborhoods' faces governance complexities, leading to divergent outcomes and limited policy coherence.
Rotterdam's model prompts reflection on scalable solutions for cities, advocating context-sensitive approaches prioritizing social connectivity.
The study contributes to advancing urban theory by challenging conventional binaries and advocating for adaptive policy design.
Integrating spatial analytics with ethnographic insights offers a holistic understanding of neighborhood dynamics, crucial for urban resilience research.