A recent study examines authorship dynamics in global health research conducted in low- and middle-income countries but published in family medicine journals of high-income countries.
Researchers focused on publications from journals with editorial offices in high-income countries featuring research from LMICs, analyzing 1,030 articles, with 431 meeting inclusion criteria.
The study highlights an increase in family medicine research from LMICs, especially in upper-middle-income countries, indicating a shift towards recognizing diverse contributions.
Authorship imbalance is evident, with senior authors from high-income countries dominating papers on low-income countries, raising concerns about knowledge production disparities.
Senior authorship often dictates study design and interpretations, reflecting a potential perpetuation of neo-colonial patterns in research from underserved settings.
Articles with HIC authors tend to have higher citation rates, pointing to challenges in visibility and academic impact faced by LMIC researchers.
The study advocates for decolonizing research practices, promoting collaboration, and enhancing authorship equity to address systemic biases and empower LMIC researchers.
Calls for inclusive editorial policies, diverse peer-review practices, and alternative evaluation metrics to foster diversity and mitigate disparities in academic recognition.
Authorship equity is crucial for fostering globally inclusive and contextually relevant research in family medicine, addressing structural imbalances within scholarly ecosystems.
The study's findings underscore the necessity for concerted efforts by stakeholders to advance global health equity and ensure fair distribution of leadership and credit in research.