Product concepts like empowerment, data-driven, product-led, customer-focused, accountability, agency, etc., are tough for teams to implement in practice.
Teams have difficulty putting these high-level concepts into practice as it requires them to describe what actual behaviors they might entail.
The author frequently gets varied responses when asked to describe behaviors based on high-level concepts, and people respond differently based on their theoretical perspectives, prior experiences, or resistance towards the exercise.
Individuals are often huge advocates and skeptics for things they’ve never done first-hand, and those who can get 'bought-in' to something they haven't done have an advantage.
Describing actual behaviors can be more effective in cutting through the context collapses that tend to accompany vague concepts.
Focus on the high-level opportunity, goal, or problem first, then use discussions about behaviors as a sense-making activity, with goal to arrive, as a team, at some specific behaviors you'd like to encourage/reinforce/see.
After narrowing down behaviors, think about what is getting in the way of them. Dirksen suggests using the COM-B model, which outlines the necessary conditions for any behavior to be enacted, including Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation.
Behavior Change Techniques (BCTs) cover a range of strategies for encouraging positive behavior change. The next step is to prioritize some interventions such as setting goals and planning, providing feedback, and using social support.
Structured follow-up systems and targeted training sessions can be used for increasing capability and reflective motivation, thereby gradually enhancing data literacy and preparing them for data analysis.
Open dialogue and normalizing mistakes are beneficial towards encouraging a culture of psychological safety, encouraging team-wide engagement, and building social opportunity and increasing automatic motivation.