The article discusses the four primary jobs related to prioritization: Efficiency, Leverage and effectiveness, Alignment and autonomy, and Support, funding, and commitment.
Efficiency focuses on minimizing context switching and reducing work in progress to help individuals or teams focus.
Leverage and effectiveness involve determining the right mix of work to maximize impact while minimizing risk and investment.
Alignment and autonomy seek shared context for collaborative decision-making and decentralized decision authority.
Support, funding, and commitment address the structural aspects of prioritization, including resources, funding, and organizational backing.
The article provides examples, such as a struggling platform team, to illustrate how these prioritization jobs manifest in real scenarios.
It highlights how discussions often intertwine these jobs, making it challenging to prioritize effectively.
Different examples, like High WIP vs. Impact/Leverage and Funding vs. Impact/Leverage, demonstrate the complexities when these jobs are not addressed separately.
The article explores the concept of 'Above the Line. Below The Line' prioritization and its challenges when combining all prioritization jobs.
It emphasizes that there is no single correct sequence for addressing these jobs and suggests different sequences based on context.
The conclusion highlights the importance of recognizing and addressing the distinct prioritization jobs to improve prioritization processes.