The article discusses the importance of context in funding and planning as startups grow and mature.
Different team types, stages, and shapes of work are explored to highlight the nuances in funding and planning approaches.
Four distinct team contexts are outlined, including Company-In-A-Company, Service Team, Blurry Team, and Adhoc Project Team.
The article emphasizes the significance of considering factors like team proximity to revenue, operational independence, traceability of impact, and replaceability.
Various team stages are examined, leading to the understanding that different funding and hiring logic apply to teams at various developmental phases.
Effort-Value Curves and Work Shapes are discussed to showcase how the value accrual and approach to work affect funding and planning decisions.
The distinction between enabling a product and the product itself in the business model is highlighted, influencing funding and planning strategies.
The article also addresses common anti-patterns in funding and planning, emphasizing the importance of forming a basic theory of investment for each team.
The recommendation is to design customized planning and funding paths based on the context of each team, taking into account constraints, work shapes, and dependencies.
The goal is to build a model that captures enough contextual nuance to be effective, fostering shared understanding and strategic alignment within organizations.
Ultimately, the article asserts that planning and funding cannot be approached in a standardized manner but require an understanding of the unique context of each team and their contributions.