Frameworks in the product world serve various purposes but the key is to be clear on why they are being used.
Four framework jobs are outlined: scaffold for judgment building, local interface for collaboration, federated interface for coordination, and quality assurance aid.
Misalignment on the purpose of frameworks can lead to misapplication and inefficiencies.
Teams may misuse a framework by treating it as a rigid process rather than a thinking tool.
Different views on experience influence how frameworks are perceived, either as necessary aids or unnecessary crutches.
Understanding the four jobs of frameworks highlights implicit assumptions within teams and organizations.
Reflection questions are posed to encourage thoughtful consideration of how frameworks are used within a team or organization.
It is vital to explicitly agree on the purpose of adopting a framework to ensure effective utilization.
Frameworks should be seen as aids for achieving specific goals rather than strict processes to be followed.
Leaders sometimes misunderstand the need for frameworks, either seeing them as unnecessary constraints or essential tools for coordination.