The author reflects on their career as a 'process person' who designs processes, admitting to moments of implementing bad processes due to lack of experience or contextual awareness.
They share an experience where creating a rigid template led to inefficiencies, showcasing the importance of flexibility and collaboration in process design.
Various instances are highlighted where processes, although well-intended, were perceived as either too lightweight or heavyweight by different teams within the organization.
The article discusses the evolution of processes, pointing out how teams may 'outgrow' structured approaches and transition to more adaptive, 'freestyling' methods.
Constraints like resource shortages can necessitate specific processes, emphasizing the importance of adapting processes to changing needs and eventually removing constraints.
The article addresses the perception of processes, noting how individuals may praise or vilify processes based on their experiences and outcomes.
It delves into the unseen process design within product organizations, highlighting issues arising from untrained personnel leading process design and the lack of consideration for diverse perspectives.
The challenges of designing effective processes in environments where trade-offs are avoided, tooling is insufficient, and unpopular decisions are shunned are discussed.
The article suggests improvements in process design by focusing on alignment, ease of participation, and eliminating ineffective processes to enhance organizational efficiency.
In conclusion, the article acknowledges the critical role of 'process' in achieving desired outcomes while urging for a more conscious and strategic approach to process design.