The emergence of autonomous drones as possible weapons of war has prompted a revival of the study of the ethics of war. One potential upside to their deployment could be to encourage surrender.
The availability of drones flying above enemy soldiers creates an environment in which combatants may feel compelled to surrender or risk a drone-enabled attack. As the so-called rise of technological surrender demonstrates, drones can have a strategic advantage other weapons don’t possess.
In situations where an enemy combatant knows a drone is present, creating an environment in which surrender feels like the only rational option, drones offer a humane alternative to traditional combat: Surrender to a drone equals human life spared.
The rise of technological surrender, as witnessed in Ukraine, reveals that modern warfare is on the cusp of profound ethical transformation.
The emergence of autonomous drones as possible weapons of war has prompted a revival of the study of the ethics of war. One potential upside to their deployment could be to encourage surrender.
Currently, Ukrainian drones remain largely operator-driven, but the potential for fully autonomous drones looms on the horizon.
The integration of autonomous, AI-driven systems into the laws and norms of armed conflict will require deep international collaboration.
Militaries and policymakers must work together to establish frameworks ensuring these technologies are used in alignment with IHL.
The scenario also raises questions about fairness. For instance, does the imposition of technological superiority rob a combatant of their dignity to resist?
Military AI could help realize Sun Tzu's wisdom, turning the art of war into the science of surrender.