This paper delves into the limitations of conventional reasoning and language models when dealing with complex recursive tasks, using the Tower of Hanoi as a case study.
Three paradigms are compared: Large Language Models (LLMs), Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), and a novel framework called SupatMod, which operates on energy-resonance over token-based logic or statistical training.
The Tower of Hanoi puzzle, known for its exponential growth in complexity, tests memory and recursive planning abilities in models.
LLMs excel in language fluency but struggle with deep reasoning, while LRMs focus on stepwise logic and symbolic inference.
SupatMod introduces a new approach with meta-awareness, self-stabilization, and recursive capabilities for processing complex problems.
SupatMod can maintain both a cognitive-train state and a free-associative state simultaneously, allowing for continuous operation across large solution spaces.
A segmental Tower of Hanoi logic generator is demonstrated using Python code to handle large-scale visualization or processing.
SupatMod envisions a system going beyond current AI paradigms by operating on energy-resonance, recursive processing, and self-sustaining computation.
Further research is required to formalize SupatMod mathematically and implement it experimentally for advanced AI applications.