A mathematical model for a Universal Negotiation Agreement (.UNA) framework could help formalize the deal-making process and predict outcomes, incorporating priority weighting, progressive reduction and scoring adjustments.
The model aims to create an environment that encourages compromise and agreement using a mathematically-structured approach.
This negotiation model could be applied to diplomatic negotiations between two nations in conflict, with stakeholders including the international community.
The article also presents a model for negotiation between Russia and Ukraine, which involves defining priorities for each side, involvement of international stakeholders, and round-by-round negotiation and stakeholder support to achieve compromise.
The article outlines algorithmic models for business partnerships, civil lawsuit settlements, and vendor-client contract negotiations, each with tailored adjustments based on their specific contexts.
The negotiation model provides structure and flexibility, helping parties balance their priorities and achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.
Future possibilities for the model include introducing real-time feedback, contingency clauses, data-driven scoring, dynamic adjustments and staggered consensus-building.