A federal court in the Northern District of California ruled that a VPPA class action lawsuit should be resolved through arbitration due to the defendant company's arbitration clause.
Plaintiffs alleged that DirectToU LLC and Alliance Entertainment LLC shared consumer data with Meta through the Meta Pixel on their websites.
Defendants filed a motion to compel arbitration, citing a clause in the Terms of Use that users had to agree to before making purchases.
Under the FAA, a party may waive its right to arbitration if it acts inconsistently with that right.
Plaintiffs argued that the Defendants had waived their right to arbitration by engaging in discovery and settlement negotiations.
The court considered various factors and determined that the Defendants had not waived their arbitration right.
The court highlighted that the settlement involved the earlier version of the complaint, not the current one.
Companies facing VPPA litigation should carefully craft arbitration clauses to reduce class action risk.
Arbitration clauses are essential but not foolproof, and companies should also be mindful of their litigation strategies.
Crafting valid and enforceable arbitration provisions is crucial to protecting arbitration rights.
Companies must exercise caution to avoid unintentionally forfeiting their arbitration rights.
Valid arbitration clauses can help companies minimize class action risks in the VPPA litigation landscape.