A recent study suggests that AI tools like ChatGPT lack the depth of representation seen in human understanding, particularly regarding sensory and motor experiences.
Large language models (LLMs) struggle with representing concepts like flowers due to their reliance on linguistic data, unlike humans who engage in multisensory experiences.
The study found that AI excels in words devoid of sensory connections but faces challenges with concepts requiring rich human experiences.
AI's limitations lie in its inability to engage in sensory interactions, leading to a gap in understanding complex concepts compared to humans.
Research compared human and AI representations of concepts using tools like OpenAI's GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, Google's PaLM and Gemini, focusing on sensory and motor information.
While AI performed well on abstract concepts, it struggled with sensory-rich terms, impacting its ability to understand words like 'flower' that evoke diverse sensory experiences.
Future interactions between AI and humans may face challenges due to differences in conceptual understanding, emphasizing the need for improved AI models.
Models trained on both textual and image data show promise in enhancing AI's grasp of vision-related concepts, hinting at a path for more enriched representations.
As AI evolves, incorporating sensory modalities could enhance its understanding, potentially leading to more effective interactions with humans.
The study underscores the complexity of human understanding shaped by direct engagement with the world, highlighting room for growth in AI technologies for better mimicry of human cognition.