Customer satisfaction scores like NPS and CSAT are likened to corporate opioids, allowing executives to sleep while their companies deteriorate.They create a false sense of security, masking underlying issues and leading to corporate complacency.These metrics fail to reflect true customer desires and instead measure how well mediocrity is accepted.Satisfaction is compared to Stockholm Syndrome, where customers settle for what they've grown accustomed to until a superior option emerges.NPS and CSAT are favored for their simplicity and comfort, providing executives with a false sense of accomplishment.Operational excellence is mistaken for innovation, hindering companies from true progress and adaptation.Customer satisfaction is valuable in industries focusing on basic service delivery but leads to stagnation in creative, innovative sectors.Innovation is about surpassing expectations, while satisfaction measures meeting existing ones.Companies often resist change due to a bias towards the status quo, preferring familiarity even if it hampers growth.Inaction driven by satisfaction scores can lead to the downfall of businesses, as exemplified by the decline of Blackberry and Nokia.Ultimately, relying on fixed satisfaction metrics hinders progress and blinds companies to necessary changes for survival and relevance.