A naukri.com initiative
Towards Data Science
1w
329
Why I stopped Using Cursor and Reverted to VSCode
- In the article, the author shares their journey of switching from VSCode to Cursor as a Data Scientist.
- The author initially praised Cursor for its interface similarity to VSCode and features like multiple LLMs and the 'Composer' project code generation.
- However, the author eventually reverted back to VSCode primarily due to GitHub Copilot's enhanced AI capabilities, including implementing state-of-the-art LLMs.
- VSCode's support for Jupyter Notebooks, GitHub Copilot instructions, and easier AI-assistance integration played a significant role in the author's decision.
- Cost-wise, the author found VSCode and GitHub Copilot more valuable than Cursor, especially considering professional usage and alignment.
- Microsoft's focus on enhancing GitHub Copilot features at a rapid pace placed it ahead of competitors like Cursor in the AI coding assistant space.
- The author encourages users to choose their IDE based on personal experience rather than online buzz, highlighting the continuous innovation in the coding assistant market.
- Personal opinions shared in the article are based on the author's experience, and they have no affiliations with Cursor, VSCode, or GitHub Copilot.
- In conclusion, the author expresses satisfaction with using VSCode and believes Microsoft's progress with GitHub Copilot positions it well in the AI-assistant IDE market.
- The author emphasizes that feature adoption across IDEs should not trigger constant switching, urging users to make informed decisions for their coding workflows.
Read Full Article
19 Likes
For uninterrupted reading, download the app